IJNRD Research Journal

WhatsApp
Click Here

WhatsApp editor@ijnrd.org
IJNRD
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal
ISSN Approved Journal No: 2456-4184 | Impact factor: 8.76 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.76 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

Call For Paper

For Authors

Forms / Download

Published Issue Details

Editorial Board

Other IMP Links

Facts & Figure

Impact Factor : 8.76

Issue per Year : 12

Volume Published : 9

Issue Published : 96

Article Submitted :

Article Published :

Total Authors :

Total Reviewer :

Total Countries :

Indexing Partner

Join RMS/Earn 300

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Published Paper Details
Paper Title: COMPARISON OF EXERGAMING VERSUS MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTION IN SUBJECTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS
Authors Name: Bandila Jahnavi , Rayudu Geetha Mounika , Dr. Patchava Apparao
Download E-Certificate: Download
Author Reg. ID:
IJNRD_216856
Published Paper Id: IJNRD2403620
Published In: Volume 9 Issue 3, March-2024
DOI:
Abstract: Background and objective: Adhesive capsulitis is a chronic condition characterized by shoulder stiffness, pain and restricted range of motion in all planes. It can be treated using joint mobilization and by conventional therapy which consists of several phases to manage pain and to enhance range of motion. However, Exergaming differs from traditional intervention and is not frequently used in clinical settings for orthopaedic problems. The aim is to evaluate the impact of exergaming versus mulligan mobilization on subjects with adhesive capsulitis in terms of pain, range of motion and function. Methods: Quasi Experimental Study Design. This study includes 80 subjects with a mean age of 40-60 years have clinically diagnosed with Adhesive Capsulitis were randomly allocated into 2 groups. In Group A (n=40) subjects were treated with Exergaming, where as Group B (n=40) received Mulligan Mobilization With Movement. Participants were treated thrice a week for 6 weeks. The outcome measures of this intervention were measured in terms of VAS for pain, Universal Goniometer for Shoulder Range of Motion and SPADI for Function. Results: The independent ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean significant difference between pre and post test scores. Paired “t” test was used to assess the statistical significance difference between pre and post test score. Statistical Analysis of the data revealed that both groups showed significant improvement in parameters when compared within groups, where as in between groups there is no significant difference between Exergaming and Mulligan mobilization with movement on pain, range of motion and function in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Conclusion: In six weeks of intervention, both groups were shown statistically significant improvements in pain, range of motion and function in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, it can be concluded that Mulligan Mobilization with Movement and Exergaming are equally effective in treating patients with adhesive capsulitis and can be chosen as a method of treatment for patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Keywords: Adhesive Capsulitis, Exergaming, Mulligan Mobilization with movement, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Universal Goniometer and Visual Analogue Scale.
Cite Article: "COMPARISON OF EXERGAMING VERSUS MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTION IN SUBJECTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS", International Journal of Novel Research and Development (www.ijnrd.org), ISSN:2456-4184, Vol.9, Issue 3, page no.g153-g176, March-2024, Available :http://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2403620.pdf
Downloads: 00025
ISSN: 2456-4184 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.76 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.76 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Publication Details: Published Paper ID:IJNRD2403620
Registration ID: 216856
Published In: Volume 9 Issue 3, March-2024
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: g153-g176
Country: -, -, India
Research Area: Engineering
Publisher : IJ Publication
Published Paper URL : https://www.ijnrd.org/viewpaperforall?paper=IJNRD2403620
Published Paper PDF: https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2403620
Share Article:
Share

Click Here to Download This Article

Article Preview
Click Here to Download This Article

Major Indexing from www.ijnrd.org
Semantic Scholar Microsaoft Academic ORCID Zenodo
Google Scholar ResearcherID Thomson Reuters Mendeley : reference manager Academia.edu
arXiv.org : cornell university library Research Gate CiteSeerX PUBLON
DRJI SSRN Scribd DocStoc

ISSN Details

ISSN: 2456-4184
Impact Factor: 8.76 and ISSN APPROVED
Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2016

DOI (A digital object identifier)


Providing A digital object identifier by DOI
How to Get DOI? DOI

Conference

Open Access License Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License This material is Open Knowledge This material is Open Data This material is Open Content

Important Details

Social Media

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Join RMS/Earn 300

IJNRD