INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal ISSN Approved Journal No: 2456-4184 | Impact factor: 8.76 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.76 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
— In order to determine the steady-state operating conditions within an electrical network, load flow analysis is essential to power system investigations. Different load flow approaches have been created to meet the objectives of various network complexity analyses. To assess the merits and drawbacks of various load flow approaches, the study carefully evaluates them through their applications on diverse bus systems. The Gauss-Seidel method, the Newton-Raphson method, and the Fast Decoupled method are the three main load flow techniques that are examined. For specific cases, the DC Load Flow technique, and Continuation Power Flow (CPF) are also offered. To evaluate the performance of the approaches at various scales, the comparison is carried out on small, medium, and large bus systems. The Gauss-Seidel method is a reasonable option for small systems because it is straightforward and has adequate convergence. The accuracy and computational efficiency of the Newton-Raphson and Fast Decoupled techniques are balanced as system size grows to the medium scale. The Gauss-Newton and Fast Decoupled approaches perform better in bigger systems because of their faster convergence. Creating MATLAB software to compute voltage magnitude, phase angle, active power, and reactive power for each bus for IEEE14 bus systems is the aim of this article. Three approaches to load flow analysis have been employed in this paper: the Newton-Raphson method, the Gauss-Siedel method, and the Fast-Decoupled method. The number of iterations achieved has been used to compare the three load flow strategies.
Keywords:
Cite Article:
"COMPARISION BETWEEN DIFFERENT LOAD FLOW METHODOLOGIES", International Journal of Novel Research and Development (www.ijnrd.org), ISSN:2456-4184, Vol.9, Issue 4, page no.e333-e339, April-2024, Available :http://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2404437.pdf
Downloads:
00025
ISSN:
2456-4184 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.76 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.76 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn